Learning has
been the subject of exhaustive investigations by psycholo-gists. The usual
psychological definition of learning is change, or i 'modification, of
behaviour or response as a result of some form of experi-ence. To understand
more fully what the psychologists say about learning one would have to examine
the key words in this definition.
Firstly, there is the word change. This
implies that the learner goes out of a learning situation as a different person
from the one he was before he went into it. The notion of the learner being a
different person at the two extreme ends of a learning situation is a very
important consideration in discussing what teachers normally do, or ought to
do, in the classroom, and this will be taken up more fully later in this book.
Secondly,
it is a change in behaviour which takes place. We did men-tion in Chapter One
that every person comes into the world with certaintraits - physical,
intellectual and emotional. The change we are talking about here does not mean a
change in physical characteristics, like the individual growing bigger or
stronger. Rather, it is the change in intellec-tual and emotional functioning
which is important. This means that, as a result of some new form of
experience, the individual now reasons in a different way, sees a problem from
a different perspective, becomes increasingly aware of the complexity of a
particular problem and interacts in a more socially acceptable way with other
people in his environment.
Thirdly, the change in behaviour we are concerned with is the
result of some form of experience. It is possible for people to deviate from
their normal behaviour because of the effect of some drug. A habitually quiet person
who suddenly becomes noisy and quarrelsome after smoking Indian hemp would be
one such example. It is also possible for a change of behaviour to be the
result of fatigue. This would be seen in the case of a man who has earlier
lifted twelve bags of cement into a truck and who finds it impossible to lift
the thirteenth bag. Experience, in the sense in which it is used in this
chapter, means something like seeing more light.
In other words, the individual will have been helped to
realise that a particular activity can be carried out in a variety of ways: to
see that a particular problem is capable of solution by adopting a new method;
to see the other side of an argument; to appreciate the beauty of a poem, a piece
of music, or a work of art. The individual’s encounter with a new experience
usually involves his interacting with other persons. This might be by listening
to a talk (as in a classroom lecture or radio talk), by observing people talk
and act, by asking and answering questions or perhaps by arguing with people.
Interaction with others might also take the form of the individuals carrying
out some investigation or experi-ment, observing natural scenes (e.g.
mountains, rivers), situations (e.g. people drinking together or dancing) or
phenomena (e.g. thunder, rain- fall) and so on. '
There are changes in behaviour that seem to come about
‘naturally’, that is, they tend to occur in the normal process of the
individual’s growing up or developing. One can think of numerous, everyday
exam-ples of such behaviour changes. A baby’s efforts to move about, such as crawling
or walking, tend to start at a particular period in life. The same goes for
those other landmarks in development which occur only when the body is
physiologically ready forthem, e.g. menstruating, getting married. Such
‘natural’ changes in behaviour are said by the psycholo-gists to be the result
of maturation. While psychologists make a distinc-tion between maturation and
learning, they admit that maturation is important in promoting learning. In
other words a person cannot benefit from his exposure to a particular form of
experience (_i.e. he cannot really learn) if he is not physiologically and
intellectually ready for such an experience. Rea_d;ness implies having the
prerequisite ability to enable one to learn. For example, the legs have to be
strong enough to enable the toddler to learn to walk, the young entrant into
secondary school needs to know enough English to be able to follow instruction
in other school subjects, etc.
The fourth implication of the psychologist’s explanation of
the con-cept learning is that learning takes time. As we have iust been saying,
an individual has to be physiologically and intellectually ready for a
par-ticular form of experience. He is subsequently exposed to the experience. Human
beings take some time to mature. It also takes time to get them to understand
fully the nature of the experience they are being exposed to. It takes time for
a new experience to make an impact on the individual. The exposure to a
particular form of experience can therefore take diffe-rent forms. In the end
the individual is expected to react to the experi-ence he has been exposed to
by modifying, or changing, his original behaviour.
Psychologists have attempted to study learning mainly by
studying animals and by putting people in experimental conditions (as opposed
to normal, everyday conditions) in the laboratory. They have subsequently tried
to generalise their findings to apply to the conditions under which people
learn in classroom situations. There have also been heated controversies over what
the right theory of learning should be. Books on learning are full of
expositions of such theories as stimulus-response, gestalt, programmed
learning, etc. The classroom teacher need not bother himself with the
controversy over such theories. In fact it is now more fashionable to see the
different theories of learning as complqnen-tary to one another. In other
words, no single theory of learning can explain everything that one needs to
know about the concept. What we consider important for the classroom teacher
is: (a) a clear understanding of what learning is, and (b) a clear idea of the
factors which make learning easier. We have already tried to provide the reader
with the former. The latter we shall now proceed to discuss.

0 comments:
Post a Comment